![]() If someone can remind me of them, let's discuss. To be fair, I'm sure there are some very good FAP benefits, they're just not coming to me right now (other than more consistent font previewing ability). IMPORTS FONTS INTO SET FONTAGENT PLUSThat's one of my most used fonts!Īnother plus for Suitcase is its very excellent font duplicate management which creates a summary report and you simply click on which fonts you want to deactivate to avoid conflict. For example, For the last three years, in all of its iterations, Suitcase has never been able to preview Adobe Woodcut font. I'm still trying to figure out if it's just me, if I've got a bunch of corrupt fonts, if I've got some conflicting shareware or what. Just for kicks I decided to go back to Suitcase X1 over the weekend and found it to be WAY faster, more refined and every bit as good as FAP with the only exception being that it can't preview about 5-10% of the fonts, which is quite a bug, I admit. I used it exclusively for nine months or more. I'm not dissing FAP, it's a good program. ![]() With Suitcase, you can just drag in a whole selection of folders and Suitcase will make folder sets that reflect them. Final Cut doesn't natively recognize Postscript or Opentype). I need to keep my fonts more organized so I can use one technology over another (e.g. If you keep your fonts organized into folders like OpenType/Sans Serif, TrueType/Script, you have to import those folders one at a time in order for FAP to maintain that organization, otherwise it just jumbles them all into one folder. Everything else about it (except only being able to view one font at a time) is really good.Īnd there's one other small negative against FAP. I am really disappointed in FB's performance. Course, nothing in OS X runs swiftly on older boxes, so it's no exception. Suitcase databases fonts very quickly, now has built-in quicksearch, multiple font comparisons and runs well on DP G4s or better. What was I thinking? Don't waste your time.įont Reserve was OK, I just didn't like its interface and it had its own laundry list of flat out bugs. Second only to installing fonts (I'm talking lots of fonts, like low thousands) in Font Book.I wasted this entire weekend, like a dozen hours, trying to get FB to work well with two thousand fonts. Installing fonts in FAP is one of life's worst experiences. Only reason I stuck with it was because it previewed all my fonts properly unlike Suitcase. The auto-activation is very quirky and I could never get it to work in Photoshop. IMPORTS FONTS INTO SET FONTAGENT PROHere's a clue to the competition, DESIGNERS LIKE TO COMPARE FONTS TO EACH OTHER.įont Agent Pro was my choice for the last nine months, but man is that thing slow. ![]() ![]() To my knowledge, Suitcase is STILL the only manager that allows multiple font viewing for comparison. All part of that "no perfect FM" I was talking about. IMHO, Suitcase is the leader of the pack, though I am still continually plagued by fonts that simply won't preview (other apps preview them fine). Anyway, this is just my opinion, but here it is: I have used all pro font managers at great length (except Juggler, which just recently became OS X ready). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |